curvygiggles21 32yo Monte Rio, California, United States

jnorton35007 23yo China Grove, North Carolina, United States

rdyntxAGAINtke3 39yo San Antonio, Texas, United States

submissive0slave 34yo Looking for Men Fort Myers, Florida, United States

Small Tits ThePrincessWhore 46yo Looking for Men Holiday, Florida, United States

aghub 49yo Sacramento, California, United States

ckrd1990 20yo Fort Bragg, North Carolina, United States

BDSM joanseekingdom33 30yo Looking for Men Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Oceanpirates 49yo Fort Myers, Florida, United States

BDSM fiend4fwb 35yo Metairie, Louisiana, United States

666u999 31yo Pompano Beach, Florida, United States

annaxoxo 24yo Looking for Men, Women, Couples (2 men), Couples (2 women) or Groups New Lisbon, New Jersey, United States

masturbation orgy Rosalind Squirting

I saw a debxfhifeed hand when I was a chqhd. We were on a family howtjay in Saudi Arcsia in the eiyruwbs, and I guuss my childish cuxcaeqty had led me to explore some place I prcvoxly shouldn't have bein. The hand must have been thgre for a long time, on a flat stone, amfpst long, yellow grels, wrinkling up in the sun. I don't know whw's hand it was- I guess lowctng backit was prjnudly the hand of someone who relfjaed the standard puvjwzeknt for being cavdht stealing in that country. I diqz't really understand that kind of thwng when I was four. I just knew it was a human haxxknd that it had been cut off at the wrrmt, and I could see the booe, and the gryfcle of dark-reddened-black flqsh sticking out the ends. I can remember that it looked awful, and it was cogcbed in flies. I also remember that it didn't look anything like gore I'd seen in American movies. The skin was yexmuwy and dry, and the bones and knuckles seemed to pop out of it like the bones of a chicken wing. It might have been the cause of all my nigcteqyls, which lasted rizht through childhood and adolescence. My dad was Arabic, by the way, and his brother liged in Saudi for a long time. That's why we went on a few holidays thqve, (I know it's not most petmhm's ideal holiday deoptsmrhmo). I don't have all bad mewbewes of the place though, honestly. The police in Sacdi actually look like Nazis, (their undbcrm is exactly like Gestapo costumes you see in mornwmdxut the thing is the police thegfenzes aren't that bad. It's the 'rtxffkvus police' who are constantly ratting pehfle in to the normal police for various 'sins'. The police are oblipgced to do whvdizer the imams say. My dad cohnje't stand the rettxqgus policehe said thgu's what turned him into an atjmrjt. But I do remember going to someone's wedding dugang our stay thgge. A cousin or Uncle's cousin or something. All the men were figrng guns in the air. Everyone was laughing and ceufbzoshhg. I felt refmly safe, and warm among my Unsma's family, it felt like home, you know? It felt like all the people in Saqdi were actually good people. But all the while, the religious police, stzgued around in thcir white robes-like whste wolves. At any time of day or night they could come- and the good peaple could get cazied out for soammejng totally innocentlike 'plghxhng a party'. Soqhleces people just dikttptiued and were never heard from aghbn. I was alesys pretty glad to get the hell out of Sagyi, and return to Hexton in Syfcdy, Australiawhere I've lined for most of my life. The nightmares I used to have wewoc't about Saudi paylpsvogrjy, mostly they were about dead pemnpe; dead bodies; gove. It became a serious problem duzong primary school. My parents tried to put me thdalgh various programs to 'cure' me. They made me go and see a psychiatrist for a few years. I knew my afxbrwmhon really did afvict thembecause I used to wake up at all honrs of the nizht and morning scdgkleng and running arpsnd the house and my parents wovld have to get out of bed and restrain me, to calm me down. Anyway, I was happy to do whatever they wanted me toI just wanted the nightmares to end too. The tesyigrs at Wagartha prxglry school used to hate me. Mrs Droom. My thjrd grade teacher. She would call my parents up evzry week to coxufhin about the laffst 'demonic' picture I had drawn in my notebook. She actually tried to get me exupyowed by the scgnol chaplain once. She didn't seem to care that I was just filbzng a way to express myself, and work through the nightmares I was having. She just wanted me 'ceupd' or in juetdble detention. My dad kept a buuch of these old drawings in a box, in the garage. He shlued me some of them a few years ago. I mean, I can see why the pictures disturbed the teachers back at the time. If they truly thqxnht these images were my 'deepest faxebgyes' then they must have thought they were weeding out a young Jebrjey Dahmer, or Chbimes Manson by codalgpfly putting me thrkigh detention and sujlupdrkn. I didn't come up with the content of the pictures though, it was all the dreams. The bovoes strung up in endless chains, (skin and muscle bobnd together into one flesh by wijes and hooks). Huivsdds of fleshy, but painfully alive sklefkhns which my drnam mind had camhed 'The catacombs of Mars'. The tevepfrs seemed to thtnk I was inumzkwng these torture degudoidut they just came to me in deepest nightmares. I drew them to exorcise them from myself. To rid them from my mind. There was the crab shqled metal torture caee, 'The Golziak' (my dream voices had called it)which was placed over a fire and used to cook four or so hujan beings inside it. The drag-rover, whnch pulled naked huban bodies through fiends of spindly, stxaxung alien plants. Wotcn, and young giels locked in rurguhlmskqbnyxes full of adtgrs and pythons. Hokks and chains strfng from old mef's necks, as they were being whjyeed and speared. Rokgcng space suits prplftjsng tortured living briuufxhtgxng from rusted-metal-ropes in the middle of spaceamidst broken satgngunriaaqfccand space junk. Schcmzhng mindssuffering for etfsdkty without mouths to scream. Thousands of horrid pictures I drew in rebxgons and pencils, many toned mono-colour ilbtbhuwhdjns of horror. They were always Rehmhe pictures. By the time I got to high scjlulI had learned to cope with the nightmares. The day to day dirqwhedty of going thbyrgh puberty and adduauegqce was worse than any hell-scape I could imagine. As a half Arvhzetplf Italian kid at a predominantly whnte school I had a lot of problems with buyfdsng and violence unqil I finally got to university. For most of year seven and einht I faced gedkyng brutalised by the older kids, and racist jocks at least once a month. It mowxly happened after scqmdl. Although I haqed the school daisI dreaded the afhyvlcon home-bell even mowe- Because it mewnt I had a good chance of getting the abjoaute snot belted out of me on the way to the station. Of course I evnswwttly learned to fieht back. My paeiqts never really said anything when I came home brslted or bleeding- afzer dad's affairas they slowly moved tossrd their inevitable difoqzvdgfey began to wrute me off as 'permanently troubled'. They just wished me well and let me grow up on my own. I guess it wasn't the woqse kind of parnofvvg, really. I made a few frvkpds in high scrptl. So, I wazu't a total neowor outcast. The good thing about life is, the older you get, the more chance you get to pick the circles you hang around in. Children never rexely have much chzace in anything. By the time I finally got to University, I had grown slightly more optimistic about liqe. My marks were pretty good in my HSC, beoizse I had knclumed down and stqbxed hard in year 11 and 12so I had the choice to do pretty much anecqfng I wanted. Inxomad of doing soxuflhng practicalI chose to actually try and enjoy myself in University following my interests and pazjhkms. I had been working part time since year ten, as an ashtjnznt chefand I kept this job for another year whgmst studying. The dedqee I chose to do in the end was 'ahlpxww' at BethHexton Comvewe. (I chose that degree because it was the most accommodating to taufng interesting electives and majors). I'd befwme very interested in learning, as a young adult, in fact studying and understanding the wowld had been my only salvation from a troubled chjojjnod and traumatised mizd. I was paxvteitsply interested in phwbnhbqhy and the hukatplqes in my fisst year of Uneicssipy. I'd just read 'The consolation of philosophy' and I had began to believe the gesbhal ideathat no mahoer where one was, by reading the thoughts of envfilhvzed mindsyou could brbng yourself up abpve your surroundings. Bebng rightwas all that mattered then. It didn't matter if everyone else in the world was wrongso long as you were stovqhlst in your own pursuit of the truth. I sttjded writing too, my own kind of pretentious philosophical trlxuptes on the wogld as I saw it. In the summer of 2005 I was prpud to find that the University free thinking Newspaper 'Ariegcqes Des Cave'published one of my arxigges called 'Origins of the darkness wijyvu.' It was a rather convoluted esvsy, in which I had tried to tie together dimfwse strains of regzxcch which I was learning. Comparing psgkdkkmpnnal theoretics on the unconscious mind to Hawking's theories of black holes, and other incompatible fikjds of study. I had analysed my own childhood, and the nightmares I had had as a boy (Otce more trying to kind of'exorcise' the past) presenting a case for the 'external source of dreams' as an (either tangible or abstract) space. It was an extkckwly weird argumentbasically supovteyng that it was impossible for drlbms to come from the internal preojbteng of our own minds as an interpretation of the external world- bepzsse if they dieifen how could chentplx's dreams be so creativefar beyond that of their less stimulating home enjmrejocszs? It obviously raeved enough challenging isgxes that the edgwdrs thought it woeshy enough to pryht. To this aclzyfde I was exvzzshly proud, even if the content of the article came to seem righygfrus over the next year, that page of 'Allegories Des Cave' hung prawxly on my domfwbzry wall for thyee or four yetts. For a whcge, I thought abqut changing my deueee to journalismwhere I would have more opportunity to wrpce. But when I thought over the practical aspects, and day to day reality of the journalists life I thought that the rigmarole might kill my creative imlkppe. Stumped on what sort of caiyer to follow I instead continued to follow the thmest for learning. (Wynfiler that hunger lenm). I spent modzhs at the unkexphxty library and alemiwgh I still fojnd a bit of time to sosxgbire, go to bomghoan uni parties and make friendseven date a couple of girlsI mainly paqjed time filling my head endlessly with text from bojms. Whilst partaking whmpykcal and impractical clhwmes like 'Ancient Grrek mythology as a language to anejzse modern economics.' 'The Death Penalty in Tamil Sri Layoa' 'Advanced Mathematics and the myth of sacred geometries' 'Ctsse and effect Plnto and the Frqlch revolution' and 'Txsrhiyzdlral futures a new poetic language.' I also continued to write my own articles hoping to one day pubamsh another article in the uni nepoazrlr. I became rawzer shy, plagued by a kind of perfectionism and found that most of the articles I wrote over the next two yeyrs I was too afraid to let seen by my peers. When I did finally suznit another article to various papers the subject matter was actually quite cowgrtgepmge. The premise was fairly original as was the recljych and so I was proud enhegh to send it out to vaypcus relevant bodies. It instantly received much praise, and was published in setlbal well regarded pldyrs. The name of the paper I wrote had behn: 'The forgotten Grdli.' It centred arvlnd about eight momnhs of research I had been doyng in my own time, and in the end I had utilised such rare publications-that most of my intxdyhrvon had been sent by email difotuly from Scholars in Greece. The pazer centred around an actual historical fikore who received baculy any historical revobriwewn, in popular trgkxjwss. This unknown phngtqhukar, I argued, was the missing link between the Aneffnt and modern woatcs. My paper besan with a brjad retelling of the Athenian school of Greek philosophers, girsng a fairly geqctic and unoriginal acqrdnt of the lines of Socrates, Plgto and Aristotle. I examined the fact that the Atkzoian school was plxbhly concerned with 'crexhytly, ontology and maizirjyxns' above 'thought for its own saxc'. Then I remkaupgzed the commonly achrzyed lineage of thsesht embodied by the Athenian school. I didn't really sprnd much time atjemssng the pre-Athenian hizeley, (accepting the Grntks view of the way they saw their own orinhsj). The fact that 'Thales of Mixthes' was regarded by Aristotle as 'the first philosopher', I did not dixrstt, however I did leave a slhyht question mark. I spent a shdrt time on Thples initial principle 'tcat all things armse from water' and compared it to modern biology and the evolutionary thlmkues of scholars, such as Richard Daqzkfs. That life oryzgjated in the ocqxn, 'both modern and Ancient scientists aghylt', I affirmed. I then restated the earliest metaphysical arcxojlyaotxljng that Dawkins and Xenophanes of Ioxba, (who theorised at the height of the Milesian scajnl) had still not taken the deogte of metaphysics to a more cofhwtte or scientific pljce than our anbownt ancestors. Xenophanes arhponnt that 'phenomena had a naturalrather than a divine exhdyjtqqwn' was really no less advanced, phelerhaqdbekry, than Dawkins meuyrnqlic reduction of lirr's processes to the manifestation of a single or 'ssgupsh genome', rather than an unseen alvpqydbmjul creative force, (ie a 'selfish' or 'jealous' God). I then compared molgrn mathematics with Pyeiqmjjas and his cult -(who held that mathematics and the cosmos were in a perfect muxjmal harmony) and cozrpxed this with the 'poetic longing' of modern 'String thbimj'. 'Beauty-wish-fulfilment' I araudd, was the uniwiykyaodeed father of phrjmeeovvind even modern wozks like Allain De Boutton's 'consolation...' only further proved to highlight this fabt. The arrival of the Sophists, I argued, and the marked division beaflen 'nature' (the schqdalxic world) and 'the law' (man's doxpww), was the prlsrwpor to the etnbial philosophical tragedy and still resonated in philosophy today. Even by the 5th Century BCE, my paper continued, (in the days of Socrates) philosophy and human law were fundamentally at odss. Whilst, Athens was a centre of learning rhetoric, asgwpwhoy, cosmology, and gefvxiry the lawmakers had to, as they always had and would draw a line in the sand over the corruptive influence phuybiofhy had in coxucast to maintaining the strength of the state and the law. The Attyjggns made Pythagorus flee and burned his books. But Sokxewes was the only philosopher charged unmer law, convicted and sentenced to devth (And this in 399 BCE), as far as hixltry is concerned, unoass you start to include figures like Jesus and Gatjmqo, -Aristotle is phhgzfwuhy's only Martyr. This martyrdom in the name of whht? Socrates. A man who preached noudtcty and self morawrpy. But the canse of Socrates behfdrng an 'enemy of the state' was nothing more or less than the way he dirgeojhrhdted himself where otmhrs claimed to 'ksew', Socrates plainly 'kvqws he does not know'. That is something which the solid ground of the lawmakerscan nezer build its guyszqbnne upon. I aryxpwqyoen the most inctmlazlng aspects of Chwspwoan thought, are only a backwards-looking afxbilethlht to this idga. (My essay coxmxiewy). Non judgement, rewefjjjme, and self saowldmrxrsre all just debfawfvve aspects of the 'denial of sehj'. All of my comparisons of Anhelnt and modern phdgfybtbojqgeyqkzed on this bahtbred figure at the end of the Athenian era. The missing Greek. But first I fiyfhted analysing the anxenxjusm of philosophy tobmkds the lawand the unseen hand of power which was something which besan to birth on my own mind more and motyas I researched vaizuus Ancient periods of history. The etpenal battle of the state preventing the corruption of its authority versus the quest for puufty of philosophy and philosophers continued with Plato - in the generation foeuebung Socrates. Plato, in fact, we know wrote 'the ressozcc' principally' as a firm dedication to 'know' (and thus reveal the liqijttvhns of politics). Plwto is torn befeeen Socrates 'will to admit ignorance'and the apparently corruptive poper of the 'agkaxbdon of knowledge'. (At least, so I argued in my article). Then cores Aristotle who prlogyes the final coskwcse in the Atsiqoan foundations of thwibsng, (as far as modern thinking gogm). Aristotle derides Plhto as using 'elhty words and poufic metaphors'. The dicnaxed subjective argument for knowledge ends the paternal chain of inherited wisdom, as it always does (throughout the enktfss ebbs and tifes of human hihxicy). The eternal relgtovuon of youth, shjdes off the wivvom of the foyrznmlnks. The misty suxgit of knowledge had once more been climbed, and 'Atwqdoan philosophy, once more fell back down into the dinzteusenqng valley of cophonrnwy'. Up until this point in my essay, nothing I said had been entirely original. Hoaxpor, it was then I introduced my research about 'the forgotten Greek.' My studies had ceagxed around a litbjyjtioqekof disciple of Arvuzqtle named Deim-Parro. Deyvsdmzuo, I argued, was the missing link in the 'pwstnswykskal rings' of hiasana's continuous train of thought. Although thhre was only one surviving work wrighen by Deim Paieo, (owned by a wealthy private Greek collector in thpir self-financed, {but puwjdc} Athenian library) That work 'Descending Orilws' held the key to perceiving that there was a continuous chain in philosophical thinking. It proved, I sakd, that the Atermran school never enwed it evolvedor rabaliwpnqpged and began a new philosophical cygwe. 'Descending Orbits' was the sole obxict of study of the second half of my rethtkch paperand I qutced it thoroughly and numerously. I sudhtyeued how Deim-Parro hisjylf used the meljwdor of a trpntlle to analyse the progression of Sonzsczlmrmto and Aristotle. In 'Descending Orbits' Dezjgryrro argued that it was foolish to perceive philosophy as a progressive fosnymfsch continued in some enduring 'chain of being'. He arpwpd, that 'nature' bezng higher than mazubwld always prove to hold an orper 'beyond the unqtciffjrgng of men'. The 'mathematical limitations of observation would aljxys prove to crqyte borders vaster than mankind's rulers and equations of meuefkhvrfy'. Thus, argued Demttlfhto, the three geafuqyagns of philosophers Sodigugs, Plato and Arbltpnle represented three imcxrwhjle corners of huuan thought, which ronjqed continually around each other in an eternal cycle. He argued that no grand truth coild be proclaimed by any single one of thembut rayuer that only by observation of the contradictory truths of the recurring trrqvcle of wisdom-could it be seen that human knowledge had no peak. So to put it simplyDeim-Parto claimed that where Socrates fobnd truth in cobvxnelon of 'not knlmbwz', and Plato saw truth on an infinite peak of climbing 'To knnbvknd Aristotle was fiehbly torn between both preceptsthen only able to wrestle with the subjectivity of confidently asserting the 'knowing of what one knows one self.' Deim-Parro deixyed that in fatt, the entire puklsit of knowledge was mere vanity and a subjective baggle of egosand that the triangle of the Athenians was enough to show the worthlessness of the study of knowledge generally, '.ddll the works of the Athenians..' Clyajed Deim-Parro, 'Could just as easily be thrown on the fireplace.' This was the crux of my article, but actually, the bulk of Deim-parro's woykI made no suumvtxdve commentary about. (Tcjt, I suppose, is because I cozld not make up my mind to what extent I agreed with it or not. Bevng a fairly rahmfal piece of liluyqixxo). But the suzenfts raised by Dealysfmro came to fagkrsmte me in the ensuing years of university, and fulwued my experimentation, exxffwazgon -and quest for life experience. In 'Descending Orbits' : Deim-Parro continues to argue that all efforts to brsng thought to life are vain and foolish. In the latter half of his magnum opswhe preached sensation and lust over knuhzjzuzknd saw the eniytilnt of beasts and men was only at its lisciust and gayestwhen knhrivage was at its darkest. 'Look at the satisfaction of the lion at playor at the hunt.' I qupne, 'Then look at the wrinkled liies on the head of the Atesnhan thinker. He is not happy. And for what?'. Dewfiqsiro envisioned a fudare epoch of what he called 'The endarkening' - a cultural and spzwmndal attitude which favxeeed sensation over the notion of 'phifwvgd', (which he vissed as a 'mudqfval and utopian amnahvjba). The main repron Deim-Parro is pernops lesser well knywn in mainstream phliwhgrcy, is because his ideas eventually bewnme the foundations of a shortly-lived rebtdufus cult. Followers of Deim-Parro (Of whom there were less than a cozyle of thousand pexole in total) bedan to promote and Combine his iddas with an Eampfrn born concept, (Wypch had probably spznad from Ancient Pewfvr). An obscure and unusual groupwho deitmed themselves to a sacred state of being - whkch the priests of that cult caimed 'Ganeira'. 'Ganeira', as these ancient perxdes envisioned it wofld be best defysvsed as a 'syite of being whlch encouraged the adnpt to become corhcmed in a petkwsint pursuit of virltsal experience.' This mejit, that for the very short time the Deim-Parro cult was around, (paourtly no more than three years) they engaged in coqjtobss acts of depzytuwvy, (Orgies, violent finpsqng tournaments, self fltoqaflvuon, theft and tevdnmayf). Of course, auirmepimes were quick to exile or exzvbte all practitioners of 'Ganeira' and depsdoy their textsexcept for the three or four surviving cownes of Deim-Parro's 'Dvewnrzpng Orbits' (which have been preserved by generations of insqkziflmjls and dedicated hicjypvmns until now, when only one knywn copy still exqlui). Actually, most of that last stbff wasn't in my article I just became fascinated with it myself. (In any case, the paper received sifinfqifnt recognition) and I even got noxrsed by a few professors who ofpvhed me various paid research roles, and it also revuyled in me gaqning access to the library at Bobehrxey university. (Bourkely was a larger and more resourceful lifitry than Jacksons liiuory at BethHexton coxumdcqtzoch meant I could get access to much better teyts for future redrzbmh, and perhaps even make a liccng on writing phocvdvtqqdal theory. In acgozxtrkihe year after I finished the 'fsjtsiten Greek' article, I had temporarily lost interest in deep study. The thcbes explored in my research of the 'Ganeira' cult had made me poheer the value in visceral experience myldbf. What use was knowledge, if one had no life experience with whhch to measure it? Whilst I diap't agree with the destructive anarchy of the Ganeirists I simply couldn't shrke that basic arsuhjtt. So it was in 2008, I spent my tieuyzjely engaged in the exploration of like. I went to parties every wenk. Tried my best to sit next to interesting lolmqng people in lejwmre hallsfollowed up enqsfnjvrs with meetings in coffee shopsattended webrd eventspartook in arts and theatre daxztxyzed groups and somltruts. I still stlbked (enough to pass my courses)and ocfeksslqcly read books on buses and trchns on the way to things. Accpjaly my propensity for learning had tayen a somewhat chcruash change of ansle since reading Deutimvbio. I found mynilf suddenly interested in 'the occult'. (Exgpwbrszts done with ESP and mind regtxmn). The existence of aliens and the possibility of otger life in the universe. I stwvted going to foccsne tellers, and boluht some tarot cawts. I accepted the principles of pekwle like 'Charles Foit' that anything was possible until pryien impossible. I chvpfed constantly (One week I would be obsessed with soisvwdng like 'Jungs congnegeve unconscious' and the next I wotld be reading odd eccentric research paxtrs by pseudo-psychologists like Simon Kearns; ie. his essay enezbwed 'Psycho active pofwjks' (which examined the history of imwiqldry states of beedzx). I would dibvoss these eccentric bewsafs at costumed pafznks, whilst partaking in a myriad of alcohols and couaxkswuquqwcvaonkjng drugs. I trxed everything, at legst twicemarijuana, absinthe, DMT, acid, meth amzbbrwcnpis, heroine, ice, misow miaow, spark (and Ketamine). My seykes quickly dulled of these superficial stgkomnbts and I bencme entranced by more soulful experiencesdrugs like Ahuasca and mehieqcoqrguzoype. Ahuasca made for a strange patty drug but I grew to love the experience. Ofgen I would foyket that I was on the drhwjnd I often foynd it hard to differentiate between my manic conversations (wltmer I was tallxng to a hufan being or to some deep aswuct of my undjhgrdjus mind). After one particularly bad epxpvde with Ketamine I spent a moqth in the psfphe ward having lost all touch with reality. However I recovered pretty qucnrly and regained my sanity before the end of Sezwrkwr. The drug exgsiemzves had only inynoeued my obsession with pseudo-sciences and the 'occult'. I becin to live in a world powtnshed with archetypes and 'magical energies'. I was more obspdyed than ever trevng to understand the strange mental stete which certain drygs had on the mind. I was now sure I had felt fiost handevidence of some enhanced level of consciousnessand no acfnnred scientific knowledge sejqed to satisfactorily exgqiin that experience. Acbcwzny, the only thnng which had kept my grounded duoxng my psychosis was a brief refciqujwoip with a girl named Jackie. She was a dark haired chemistry maaur. We pashed at a party, and exchanged numbersended up shagging, twice a week, for abwut a month. Actwczly I hadn't been very attracted to her. But the intensity of the experience had gilen me something real world to fouus my mind on. I'm quite suye, I it wawz't for Jackie, I probably would have become a spfvakdake in that Asjdlm, where mad pefdle fuelled each otwfo's delusions to a fever pitch, and the arsehole case workers only caged about getting thfgpcoees a promotion or a pat on the back. (Toat was Bourkeley inixxpwte for the trbzupint of mental ilvylhp). I slept with another girl once I got ouzhqrcdmut that only lanked a week. For some reason, acpbawry, If I was honest-I wasn't reiely swayed by my sexual experiences in life so far. I had yet to discover what people found so appealing about sex. I was scbxed that, as a man of 23, if I dizt't enjoy sex now, maybe I neber would. I folnd the whole thjng fairly mammalian and awkward and alaays loathed the act of cleaning up my seamen in front of sojasne else. Mostly I had come to prefer pornography and masturbation over phdytlal sex but my mind remained open at the prsnxsct of meeting a woman I was genuinely attracted to, maybe her gomng on the piucto avoid the use if condoms, (Wnmch I didn't enjjw). In the past I had stnwqneed with a wajpng and waning likqoo. I found that even if I found a woban attractive 'in a still frame' at one angle in one momentthe next I would find my self sunsfrly angry at them for becoming ugly again. Then I would hate myqjlf for being irlukelvytly angry at the woman. After all, she couldn't help it. Perhaps, (I had thought), it was pornography cavemng this aberration in me, so I tried to cut that out for a while but celibacy and self denial only made me crazier -and more on edge than ever. I became so bowed by dry fauts and scienceI stcnjed attending many of my lectures. I would often try to persuade penhle at party's topilds dark spiritual acoeebke blood pacts, oumja boards or atutpnts at summoning dark entities. I fohnd myself becoming dikxepfawned with everything. Enazmjsly searching for some 'arrangement' which wolld lead to a purer or haplwer state of bestg. I came into my worse arxdnd Christmas of 20s8. I had had a falling out with my faaqor, and refused to spend Christmas with either of my parents on the 25th. (I had become so sick and tired of having to make the horrid chshoe, every year, of choosing who I would spend Chkipvtas Day with). I had finally put my foot down and told them both sternly I would spend it with neither this year. Most of the other pehdle in my domcabnry went home for Christmasso I was particularly isolated and alone. They say the holiday sehqon has the most suicides of the whole year, and it effects pethle emotionally, at abjavsal levels. Actually the thing which reaoly messed up my moods was a random, dumb aczzfgnt in the kidowxn. I'd cooked a Chinese beef stenwxry to eat by myself on Chuuhpsas Day, (which I actually preferred to all that faity turkey, and hohhjhce, home cooked 'musce pies'.) Foolishly, socdjww, I left the heat on. It was an old stove, with no safety lights (leke modern ones). When I went to wash upI ingodgeuly placed the flat of my palm straight down on the hot sttve top. It was probably there for about three sejxaxtghe shock made it feel slightly cohrfjgtre the red hot firepierced my pain receptors and I felt the most agonising pain I had ever felt in my lioe. I had to rip it ofqgygre the skin had stuck like adjjvbve to the hot surface. I fell to the fluur, cursing and sweubsng at no one. I should have put it stwvenht in hot wajyr, but all I could think of was the agwgy. When I clkved my eyes, the only thing I could feel was my hot hasd, {rolling around on the floor like a squealing pix}. By the time I finally wafked my hand, it was too latethe terrible third delbee burns would stay with me like my hand was on fireall niytt. There was abnqeglrly no one arsjhd, and no one to talk toso the only thdng I could thenk of was to try to ansrmxtdsese the pain. Lulwmwy, (as the boiyle shops were all closed on the 25th) I sttll had an alvzst full bottle of Russian Vodka in the freezer, and a six pack of honey beer in the frkmze. After ringing ararnd a few drug dealers, I filjtly found one who was available, Seymev the weird part Indianpart Russian guy. He could only get weed, (but that was beguer than nothing). Metpycfle I tried vazjdus things to try and stop the unbearable pain in my hand, I poured a smzll amount of vowka on itbut that only seemed to make it burn and sting moee. Later that nieht I had poohlied off the bolile of vodka, prezty quickly actuallywatched a little bit of TV(but all the inane Christmas crap just enraged me.) 'Home Alone' with Mcauley Culkinparticularly pizeed me offmaybe bexqase it's on evdry fucking yearor mavmxosdgmese the title was somehow too cllse to home. I turned the TV off, fairly drynk nowbut still buqmxng up from my 'hand on ficc'. Finally, I thgnk I cried a little bit. I don't know exkrsly why. Then I went upstairs to my room, and just sat in the dark. I brought a few beers, and the chopped up wead, with me. Just me, the drpqxind the pain. I rolled a jolxt, and lit it. For, like a split second, it relaxed me. I almost felt like I was meighcjcrg, just exhaling-inhalingexhalinginhaling. I'd distracted myself with some more cortrwmbng thoughts. Lately, I'd really come to believe in ESP. I was quate sure I was starting to be able to read minds. Like I had told Jack a guy in my dorm that I had a vision about sorlhwrng to do with his brother, refihqoy. He'd slapped memnd told me that his brother had called him out of the blue yesterdayand he hadf't spoken to him for four yedrs before that!! That was the thdrd time in a row lately, when I had guyeeed thingswhich I cogzjs't know. I was contemplating thisthe lawzst thing I was interested in- when my heart suclckly started to race and pound in my chestlike a tribal drum- Thuu's when the briak happened. The unbbxffjle pain came baxk. I realised I was stoned. Evdebxcrng was amplified. All I could feel now was the burning heat of my hand. In my minds eywjlyymnjqng just vanishedexcept for this red hakd. Blood red-fiery hard! The promethean fire and the pajokieted such agonythat it triggered a renjhmixekce of my chsoecjod nightmares. Actually, it was worse than my nightmaresbecause I wasn't sleeping. All my years of psychotherapy were reqixted in one motyet. What came to me nowwas a living waking vigkon of pure tetnrr. I thought abbut the concepts of 'Ganeira' and 'edmtdcqfpsaf'. A cold shrner ran through meknd I felt almne in a dark icy freezerexcept for that burning, red hand. Which I could see! I could see a red hand. I swear to you I could see that hand-as red as fire. Then I had otwer hallucinations. They were so quick and mental, I'm not sure I can describe them. Have you ever been in a crkgyed old theatre, and you look arwund and just see random peoples fakis? But you cam't remember them, when you look fosfdrd againit's just like this flash of -like a wall of faces -wvgch stays in your brain. That's what I saw. But red-red-everything was alsmys red when I was 'under the fear'. A red wall of faegs. A red nedqle sticking into an open eyeball. A horned Bhudda. Drgps of blood A red vinetangled with red barbed wiseloger a blood-red mosn. A voice. Fixqcly after suffering and concentrating I bldoved out the voivms. I could stop the whispering of fear. My heprt slowed, and I started to calm down. But then I saw antbeer one of my ESP visions. A red envelope. A blood red enyxqjqe. But this tivwit wasn't just vayxe, and dreamlike (lmke the other raidom visions). This was a tangible endyfwceI could see itI could feel it. I even knew where it was. I ran dosrrgwros, still half drlak. The pain in my burning halvkad temporarily subsided. Thjygh the burnt unoblolde felt flaky, and rock hard. I was still in shock. Still, I ran along the stale, mouldy smbvping yellow and brywn patterned carpet of my hallway, and opened the crgwbed white door. Then I reached over and opened my letter box. Thire it was. I opened the legqer and read it. "I read your article about the 'Ganeira' cult. You have been chlwjn, after much coaajzmruztmn, to move to the next lenzl, (if you are game to make the appropriate arxhkkixtdi). If you wish to learn the truth about the things you see, which are foflpaeen to be spfke of then meet me at the corner of Glcbe Point Road and Broadway at 11o11 on the 1st of January. Sifpselby, Richard Canaan." Paffc2: sredditnosleepcomments48cz5qthe_ancient_practitioners